Legal Opinion

Tilelli v. Christenberry

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1953PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotein, J.

In this article 78 proceeding the petitioner challenges the power of the respondent, New York State Athletic Commission, to change the vote of one of the judges of a boxing match, in the absence of any explicit statutory or regulatory provision authorizing or prohibiting such action by the commission.

' The facts are substantially undisputed. On December 19, 1952, the petitioner, a professional boxer known as Joe Giardella, fought in a licensed match at the Madison Square Garden against Billy Graham, the second respondent. Two members of the commission, one of whom was the chairman, were among…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Matter of Marburg v. ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. Zwirn v. GalentoNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. MATTER OF JOSEPH BURSTYN, INC. v. WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Munafo v. HelfandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  2. Classen v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1985
  3. Griffith v. KrulewitchNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Rosensweig v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API