Legal Opinion

City of East Liverpool v. Columbiana County Budget Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2005No. 2003-1003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 1} The city of East Liverpool challenges a Board of Tax Appeals’ decision that determined that the Columbiana County Budget Commission had properly adopted and used an alternative formula for allocating the 2003 Undivided Local Government Fund (“ULGF”) and Undivided Local Government Revenue Assistance Fund (“ULGRAF”) dollars to the political subdivisions within Columbiana *411County.1 For the reasons that follow, we reject the city’s challenge, and therefore we affirm the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals.

{¶ 2} On August 29 and August 30, 2002, Columbiana County and 26 political…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Columbus City School District Board of Education v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State ex rel. Satow v. Gausse-MillikenOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  5. City of Lancaster v. Fairfield County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. City of East Liverpool v. Columbiana County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. City of Elyria v. Lorain County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API