White v. Loomis Armored US, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND
DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in this case filed a complaint in the Wayne County, Michigan circuit court alleging violations of state law arising from their termination from employment as armored car drivers. After the defendant removed the ease to this Court alleging diversity jxirisdiction, the plaintiffs filed a timely motion to remand, which is now before the Court, contending that the amount in controversy is below the jurisdictional limit. The Court heard oral argument on the motion on May 27, 2010, and now finds…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Rose M. Clark v. National Travelers Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ramirez v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011