United States v. Groce
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
SWINFORD, District Judge.
The record is before the court on the motion of the defendant, Willie Charles Groce, to invoke what he contends to be the requirements of Rule 32(d), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to correct and/or set aside the judgment of conviction and sentence. While the defendant in his motion cites 28 U.S.C.A. 2255, the motion was filed in the criminal case and may be considered in connection with the criminal ease rather than to consider it an institution of a civil ease under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255.
The sole question presented by this motion is whether the plea of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. James CodyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Robert E. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Marcus Laverne Sherburne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Earnest Dean SandersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. GroceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973