Legal Opinion
United Food & Commercial Workers Local 99 v. Brewer
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 23, 2011No. CV-11-921-PHX-GMSPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
G. MURRAY SNOW, District Judge.
Pending before this Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Plaintiff-Intervenors’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Docs. 14, 77). For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff-Intervenors’ Motion is granted and Plaintiffs’ Motion is dismissed as moot.
BACKGROUND
An employee in the state of Arizona may authorize his or her employer to withhold certain amounts from the employee’s pay and to transfer those funds to a separate entity. Through such payroll deduction programs, employees pay their health care ór other welfare benefit premiums to…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Interpipe Contracting, Inc. v. Xavier BecerraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Wisconsin Education Ass'n Council v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United Food & Commercial Workers Local 99 v. BennettDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2013
- Wisconsin Education Ass'n Council v. WalkerDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2012
- Bailey v. CallaghanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.