Legal Opinion

United States v. Jesus Pimentel-Lopez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 15, 2016No. 14-30210PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:

The jury in defendant’s criminal case made a special finding that the quantity of drugs involved was “less than 50 grams.” We consider whether the district judge may nevertheless calculate defendant’s sentence based on the judge’s finding that the quantity involved was far in excess of 50 grams.

FACTS

Defendant was convicted of possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute and conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. The punishment for both of these crimes is determined by section 841(b), which sets…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Lee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Debbie Floyd v. Larry Laws, and City of Sherwood, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Pimentel-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Jesus Pimentel-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Pimentel-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. Yijun ZhouCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Yijun ZhouCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API