Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Pimentel-Lopez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 15, 2016No. 14-30210Published

1Dissent

GRABER, Circuit Judge, with whom TALLMAN, BYBEE, CALLAHAN, BEA, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges,

join, dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc:

I respectfully dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc. The panel held that when a jury finds that the amount of drugs the government has proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, is attributable to a defendant falls within a specified range, the sentencing judge may not find by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount of drugs attributable to the defendant is higher than that range. United States v. Pimentel-Lopez, 828 F.3d 1173, 1176-77 (9th Cir.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Lee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Debbie Floyd v. Larry Laws, and City of Sherwood, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API