United States v. Pimentel-Lopez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Dissent
GRABER, Circuit Judge, with whom TALLMAN, BYBEE, CALLAHAN, BEA, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges,
join, dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc:
I respectfully dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc. The panel held that when a jury finds that the amount of drugs the government has proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, is attributable to a defendant falls within a specified range, the sentencing judge may not find by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount of drugs attributable to the defendant is higher than that range. United States v. Pimentel-Lopez, 828 F.3d 1173, 1176-77 (9th Cir.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Debbie Floyd v. Larry Laws, and City of Sherwood, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.