Legal Opinion
BNSF Railway Company v. Pacific Steel, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 23, 2026No. 3:23-cv-01202Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Case No.: 23-cv-01202-JLB 14 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PACIFIC STEEL, 15 v. INC.’s MOTION REGARDING AMENDED RESPONSES TO 16 PACIFIC STEEL, INC., REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS 17 Defendant. PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 36(b) 18 19 [ECF Nos. 90, 96, 97] 20 Before the Court is the Motion Regarding Amended Responses to Requests for 21 Admission Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36(b) (“Motion”) filed by 22 Defendant Pacific Steel, Inc. (“Defendant”). For the reasons…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ashley Hunt Greenwood v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Michael J. Conlon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Ollie B. Hadley, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Gallegos v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Knatt v. Hospital Service District No. 1 of East Baton Rouge ParishCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008