Legal Opinion
People v. Laramore
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided July 17, 2003PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed.
Defendant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that the evidence was legally sufficient to establish defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, with respect to defendant’s contention that the evidence does not support a finding of “intent to use unlawfully against another,” it is well settled that intent may…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. . GaimariNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- People v. GarafoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- People v. AlmodovarNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. McManusNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Levy v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Breitkopf v. GentileDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- People v. RichardsCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2008
- People v. VoltaireCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2007