Lynn v. Wagstaff Motor Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Presiding Judge.
A person' may intervene of right when he "claims an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject matter of the action and he is so situated that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede his ability to protect that interest, unless the applicant’s interest is adequately represented by existing parties.” Code Ann. § 81A-124 (a) (2). It has frequently been stated that the requirements for intervention under the rule are three-fold: interest, impairment resulting from an unfavorable disposition, and inadequate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bloodworth v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Walden v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Happy Valley Farms Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Betts v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Five Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Hogan v. HermannIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Young v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1974
- Kubler v. GoergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Brown v. TruluckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.