Legal Opinion

Hill v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 7, 1924No. 24,163PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Plaintiff was employed by defendant as a brakeman on an interstate passenger train operated between Dulutb and Brooten via Superior, Wisconsin. At Superior, January 30, 1923, the train was going to back away from tbe depot and it was plaintiff’s duty to *485be at tbe rear end of tbe train and watch street crossings which the train had to pass over. Plaintiff walked to the first street crossing and gave a backup signal and the train started. As it came to him he undertook to get on, using the steps of the rear end of the rear coach, and fell and was run over. As a result thereof, he lost his left…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. KaufmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Rose v. Franklin Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. McNaney v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. FinchDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1915
  5. City of Boston v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Volding v. HarnishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Knight v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. W. A. Shields and Southern Railway Company, W. A. Shields v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company and Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  4. Fleming v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  5. Jacobson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API