Legal Opinion
Schlesinger v. Woodcock
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 2001No. 00-268PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KITE, Justice.
[¶1] Appellant Mary Beth Schlesinger and her company, Custom Syndicated Research, Incorporated (CSR), obtained numerous loans from private individuals; some were documented with promissory notes, and some were not. All the notes and the verbal negotiations described the same terms. Ap-pellee Betty Jane Woodcock, one of the lenders with both documented and undocumented loans, sought to collect claiming the parties' course of dealing established the loan terms for the undocumented loans. After default, Ms. Schlesinger obtained Ms. Woodeock's signature on a modified loan agreement…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hopper v. All Pet Animal Clinic, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Prudential Preferred Properties v. J and J Ventures, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Da Shores v. Dl LindseyWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Prows v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Cross v. Berg Lumber CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sincock v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Alexander v. MedunaWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Wells Fargo Bank Wyoming, N.A. v. HodderWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Rock Springs Land and Timber, Inc. v. LoreWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- McNeill Family Trust v. Centura BankWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.