Legal Opinion · Dissent
SAIF Corp. v. Vanlanen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 20, 1994No. WCB 91-13600; CA A76539Published
1Dissent
DURHAM, J. pro tempore,
dissenting.
The Board held that payments under the August 15, 1991, determination order, which awarded TTD and PPD, are not stayed by SAIF’s prior request for Board review of the referee’s decision that the low back injury is compensable. In SAIF v. Vanlanen, 120 Or App 613, 614, 852 P2d 281 (1993), we reversed the Board and said:
“We conclude that, under ORS 656.313, employer’s May 23, 1991, appeal of the referee’s order on compensability did stay payment of benefits awarded by the later determination order. Diamond Fruit Growers v. Goss, 120 Or App 390, 852 P2d 915,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. PiwowarOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. MaddoxOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. HughesOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Diamond Fruit Growers v. GossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.