Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Leigh
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 12, 1996No. OBAD No. 1175, SCBD No. 4044Published
1Opinion of the Court
914 P.2d 661 (1996)
STATE of Oklahoma ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant,
v.
Edmond Dale LEIGH, Respondent.
OBAD No. 1175, SCBD No. 4044.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
March 12, 1996.
Janis Hubbard, Assistant General Counsel, Oklahoma Bar Association, Oklahoma City, for Complainant.
R. Michael Cantrell, Patricia K. Cantrell, Oklahoma City, for Respondent.
OPALA, Justice.
In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Is the record[1] sufficient for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint's disposition? and (2) Is a 180-day suspension with…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.