Legal Opinion

Rossetti v. Hill

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 20, 1947No. 11235PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

The question of jurisdiction is raised by the appellees on petition for rehearing on the ground that Section 2, Article III, of the United States Constitution and the Judicial Code, Section 24, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41, do not give jurisdiction to the federal district court in an interpleader action where all claimants to the fund are residents of the same state.

The appellees rely on the decision in Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co., 308 U.S. 66, 60 S.Ct. 44, 84 L.Ed. 85. In that case the Supreme Court held that the federal district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.. S.C.A. §…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Mallers v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
  3. Security Trust & Savings Bank of San Diego v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  4. Turman Oil Co. v. LathropDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. MeguireDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1936

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. KraftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  2. Republic of China v. American Express Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  3. JEFFERSON STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1956
  4. Federal Old Line Insurance v. McClintickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  5. Gannon v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API