Legal Opinion

Benjamin Funk and Betty Lou Funk v. Ward Tifft D/B/A the Tifft Agency and Pendor-Idaho Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 28, 1975No. 73-1785Published

1Opinion of the Court

515 F.2d 23

Benjamin FUNK and Betty Lou Funk, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Ward TIFFT d/b/a the Tifft Agency and Pendor-Idaho

Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 73-1785.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 22, 1975.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing May 28, 1975.

Stephen Bistline (argued), Sandpoint, Idaho, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Hardy C. Lyons (argued), Sandpoint, Idaho, for defendants-appellees.

Before LUMBARD,* MERRILL and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

LUMBARD, Circuit Judge:

1

Plaintiffs Benjamin and Betty Lou Funk appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Idaho entered on…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Quinn v. PhippsSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  3. Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Sandra J. Douglas, for Herself and as Representative of a Class v. Beneficial Finance Co. Of AnchorageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  5. Mitchell v. AllisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API