State v. Patton
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
133 N.J. 389 (1993)
627 A.2d 1112
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
MILTON OCTAVIUS PATTON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued February 16, 1993.
Decided August 3, 1993.
Barbara A. Rosenkrans, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (James F. Mulvihill, Acting Essex County Prosecutor, attorney).
Lawrence E. Miller argued the cause for respondent (LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae, attorneys; William R. Holzapfel, Daniel J. McCarthy, Ellen B. Silverman, Elizabeth J. Gorman, and Francis V. Cook, on the briefs).
Richard W. Berg, Deputy Attorney General,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.