Legal Opinion

State v. Patton

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 3, 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

133 N.J. 389 (1993)

627 A.2d 1112

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

MILTON OCTAVIUS PATTON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued February 16, 1993.

Decided August 3, 1993.

Barbara A. Rosenkrans, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (James F. Mulvihill, Acting Essex County Prosecutor, attorney).

Lawrence E. Miller argued the cause for respondent (LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae, attorneys; William R. Holzapfel, Daniel J. McCarthy, Ellen B. Silverman, Elizabeth J. Gorman, and Francis V. Cook, on the briefs).

Richard W. Berg, Deputy Attorney General,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API