Legal Opinion

State v. Sandberg

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 17, 1986No. C7-86-8PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Appellant Carl Lee Sandberg was convicted following a jury trial of criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.345(b) (1984). Following his conviction, appellant moved for acquittal or a new trial, claiming error in various trial court rulings. Both motions were denied.

This appeal is from the judgment of conviction pursuant to Minn.R.Crim.P. 28.02, subd. 2(1). We affirm.

FACTS

■On September 3,1983, appellant engaged a 13-year-old male in sexual activity. Appellant’s and the child’s testimony conflict concerning whether the appellant touched…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. State v. CaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Nicole V.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Scadden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. SandbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. State v. OstlundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. State v. OstlundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API