Legal Opinion
State v. Ostlund
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 15, 1987No. C5-87-390Published
1Opinion of the Court
416 N.W.2d 755 (1987)
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
Janet Marie OSTLUND, Appellant.
No. C5-87-390.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
December 15, 1987.
Review Denied February 24, 1988.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Thomas L. Johnson, Hennepin Co. Atty., Vernon E. Bergstrom, Chief, Appellate Section, J. Michael Richardson, Asst. Co. Atty., Minneapolis, for respondent.
Ronald I. Meshbesher, Steven J. Meshbesher, John P. Sheehy, Meshbesher, Singer & Spence Ltd., Minneapolis, for appellant.
Heard, considered and decided by WOZNIAK, P.J., and FOLEY and CRIPPEN, JJ.
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Appel…
Also in this document: Dissent · Crippen; Dissent · Crippen.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. WahlbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. LeinweberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.