Legal Opinion

City National Bank v. Riggs

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 23, 1934No. 4-3451PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcHaney, J.

This is the second appeal of this case-For the former opinion see City National Bank v. Riggs, 188 Ark. 420, 66 S. W. (2d) 293. On the former appeal we held that the appellants had wrongfully satisfied the record as to certain property covered by a mortgage to it as agent to secure an indebtedness to appellees and others represented by notes which had been assigned by it, and that appellants became liable to the noteholders for their pro rata share of the sale price of the property so released from the record of said mortgage; that the inclusion of the homestead of appellee, Jessie M.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roe v. KiserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  2. Hill v. KavanaughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  3. City National Bank v. RiggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  4. Troyer v. Bank of DequeenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  5. Trible v. NicholsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City National Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  2. Rotge v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. City National Bank v. Johnson (1)Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  4. Jones v. TindallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  5. City National Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API