Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. Bartlett

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1964No. 38263Published

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The primary question presented by this appeal is whether a trial court on discovering after term that it made an error in its application of the law in its judgment may on motion by a party vacate such judgment and enter a new one.

This cause arose as a proceeding to determine heirship during the administration of an estate. Generally the administration of an estate is a continuing process until the termination thereof by the approval of the final account. However, a proceeding to determine heirship, although it occurs during and might be said to be a part of the administration of the estate,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wooten v. FriedbergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  2. Ellern v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Babb v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. Becker v. RootheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  5. Carr v. CarrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API