Casey Modiri v. Barclays Bank Delaware

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 CASEY MODIRI, Case No. 26-cv-02549-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 9 v. REMAND 10 BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE, [Re: ECF No. 12] 11 Defendant. 12 13 Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Casey Modiri’s motion to remand, which includes a 14 request to recoup associated costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). See ECF No. 12 (“Mot.”). 15 Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s motion, and Plaintiff filed a 16 reply. See ECF No. 13 (“Opp.”); ECF No. 14 (“Reply”). 17 The Court finds…