Legal Opinion
Olin v. Kitzmiller
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 29, 1922No. 246PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
court.
The bill was dismissed upon motion by the trial court for want of equity and the Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed this action. 268 Fed. 348.
Appellant — a native of Russia who has declared his intention to become a citizen of the United States^ — claims the right to fish in specified locations in the Columbia River and seeks a mandatory injunction requiring the Master Fish Warden and other officers of Oregon to issue a license therefor.
His prayer is based upon the theory that so much of c. 292, General Laws of Oregon, 1919, as directs that no fishing license “ shall be issued to any…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Olin v. KitzmillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sohappy v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1969
- Anthony v. VeatchOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Hubble v. Bi-State Development AgencyIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
- Dutton v. TawesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Henderson v. Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.