Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Grey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 18, 2009No. PD-0137-09Published

1ConcurrenceCochran, J.

I agree that Arevalo 1 was wrongly decided, that the four dissenters in Arevalo were correct,2 that the doctrine has proven unworkable, and that it has led to unjust, unanticipated results. I join the majority in overruling it.

But I would go further and provide some guidance to the bench and bar on when a trial court must grant a request by either the defense or State for a lesser-included instruction and when it may include such an instruction, with or without a request.

The goal of jury instructions is to guide the jury’s deliberations in reaching an accurate verdict based upon the facts and…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Hutch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API