Legal Opinion

People v. Latham

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 23, 1988No. A040356PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RACANELLI, P. J.

In this case, we attempt to clarify the obligation of the trial court upon revocation of probation to state reasons for declining to reinstate probation. We will conclude that when sentence has previously been imposed in the form of pronouncement of judgment and execution thereof suspended during a period of probation, no reasons are required upon revocation of such probation for the decision ordering the previously suspended sentence into execution.

Facts

The underlying facts are undisputed:

In 1984, defendant pled guilty to possession of LSD; imposition of sentence was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. VickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. PreyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. People v. ChagollaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. People v. CushwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. AmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. People v. PenningtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. People v. MedinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. People v. HawthorneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API