George v. Belk
Tennessee Supreme Court
EBOM WILSON. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Wilson County. W. C. Houston, J.
1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.
This is an action for malicious prosecution, in which two trials occurred and a large bill of costs was accumulated in the Court below. On the last trial the jury came into Court and reported a verdict in this form, viz.: “We find that defendant should pay all the costs and that the plaintiff recover one dollar.” Upon the suggestion of counsel for the plaintiff, that the jury were evidently laboring under a misapprehension on the subject of costs, and that it ■ would be well for the Court to instruct them, the Court then said, in substance, “You have nothing to do with the matter of costs,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Warner v. . New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Blackley v. SheldonNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- Root v. SherwoodNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- Brown v. DeanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Johnson v. RiderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Grace v. CurleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926
- Waddle v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- Birkel v. ChandlerWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Riley v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
- McCarty v. MorrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.