Legal Opinion

Crossman v. Crossman

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 4, 1964No. 1040PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing the wife’s libel for divorce in proceedings before the Rutland County Court. The action was founded on the claim of intolerable severity. While the libelee was represented by counsel at the hearing in county court, the record discloses that such counsel presented no witnesses in behalf of the libelee, did not cross-examine the libelant or her witnesses, and made only a statement relative to the libelee’s payment of support money in the course of the proceedings. It is also noted that although counsel for the libelee has entered an appearance in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McClary v. HubbardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  2. McKinney v. McKinney KelleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  3. Mathewson v. MathewsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908
  4. Gilbert v. GilbertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
  5. Strong v. StrongSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Krupp v. KruppSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  2. Little v. LittleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  3. Potwin v. TuckerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  4. Pacquin v. PacquinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  5. East Montpelier Development Corp. v. Barre Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API