Legal Opinion

Plumitallo v. 1407 Broadway Realty Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDi Gtovanna, J.

On this motion to dismiss the complaint against the defendant Hooker it appears that the plaintiff commenced third-party actions against several defendants prior to the expiration of the six-month period provided in section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law; and that it was not until after the expiration of the said six-month period that service of summons was effected upon the defendant Hooker. The defendant Hooker now claims that the defense set forth in its "answer required judgment for the defendant, dismissing the complaint against said Hooker, because of the failure of the plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eisenberg v. Louis Adler Realty Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Plumitallo v. 1407 Broadway Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  2. Farrell v. American Beverage Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Paschall v. MooneyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  4. Rose v. Sun Oil Co.New York Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API