Legal Opinion

Doe v. Ensey

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 2004No. 3:CV 02-0444PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JONES, District Judge.

Pending before this Court is Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Production of Psychological and Psychiatric Records and Evaluations of Defendant Fathers Ensey and Urrutigoity (hereinafter “Defendant Priests” or “Frs. Ensey and Urrutigoity”). We have reviewed the submissions of the parties and taken into consideration the presentations made at oral argument on January 27, 2004. For the reasons set forth below, we will grant Plaintiffs Motion subject to certain strict limitations.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

John Doe and his parents John Sr. and Jane Doe (hereinafter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Zane v. Friends HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Rost v. State Board of PsychologyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. M. v. State Board of MedicineCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lebovitz v. Hartford InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API