Legal Opinion
Grace v. Rosenstock
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 30, 1996No. 85-CV-2039 (DGT)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LEVY, United States Magistrate Judge:
Plaintiffs move pursuant to Rule 25 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for substitution of executors for two deceased named plaintiffs. Plaintiffs also move pursuant to Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to supplement and further amend their amended complaint. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND AND FACTS
Plaintiffs, minority shareholders of defendant Briggs Leasing Corporation (“Briggs Leasing”),1 commenced this action individually, as a class, and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Harry L. DILLMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Bornholdt v. BradyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Grace v. Bank Leumi Trust Company Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Grace v. RosenstockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Grace v. Bank Leumi Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Barr v. Charterhouse Group International, Inc. (In Re Everfresh Beverages, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Ex Parte OvertonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.