Legal Opinion

People v. Keith

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 1981No. Crim. 34075PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, P. J.

J.— Defendants Stanley D. Keith and William Keith were charged with various sexual assaults, including forcible rape, forcible oral copulation and forcible sodomy. The victim was J.R., who was 15 years old at the time. The information included various peripheral charges, such as kidnaping and the use of a firearm. After a jury trial both Stanley and William were found guilty on two counts of forcible rape and two counts of forcible oral copulation. Stanley was found guilty on one count of sodomy and one count of kidnaping. In addition the jury found true that defendants…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. HitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. ZamoraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Prudhomme v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. FriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Ledger v. TippittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Gagne v. BookerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. Rieger v. ArnoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. People v. TolhurstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API