Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Sackrison

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 17, 1899No. Nos. 11,838—(77)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover $160.-75 for goods sold and money lent. The ease was tried before Holt, J., who found in favor of plaintiffs for $136.73; and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

Action to recover for goods sold and money loaned. The defendant, as a counterclaim, alleged that on March 15,1894, he was in the lawful possession of a store building and the land upon which it was *108situated, and that on that day he leased them, with certain butcher’s tools, from month to month, to the plaintiffs, for the agreed rent of $15 per month; that the plaintiffs entered into possession of the premises under the lease, and so occupied them until December 19, 1895; and that they have not paid the rent therefor, except for five months. The reply admitted that the plaintiffs entered into…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Collom v. BixbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schuchard v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. McCray v. Superannuated Fund of the Evangelical AssnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. State ex rel. Mondale v. Hanna Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API