Legal Opinion

Aiken v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided November 9, 2000No. 03-99-00200-CRPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarl E.F. Dally, Justice

(Retired).

Appellant Douglas Aiken was convicted in a bench trial of the offense of misapplication of fiduciary property. See Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 32.45 (West Supp.2000). The trial court assessed appellant’s punishment at confinement in a State jail facility for two years. Imposition of sentence was suspended and appellant was placed on community supervision for five years. Appellant asserts the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support his conviction. The judgment will be reversed because the evidence is legally insufficient to support appellant’s conviction.

Appellant as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Bynum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Staley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Saldana v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
  2. Baxter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
  3. Ronk v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  4. David Daniel Lauer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  5. David Daniel Lauer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API