Ronk v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELIPE REYNA, Justice.
A jury convicted Edward David Ronk of misapplication of fiduciary property based on his failure to return excess funds he held under a construction contract which he had terminated. Ronk contends in his sole issue that the evidence is legally insufficient to prove that the person who contracted with and paid him for the construction of a new home was the owner of those excess funds or the person for whose benefit Ronk held those funds. We will affirm.
Background
Mark Schneider and Lori Magner (collectively, “Schneider”)1 contracted with Ronk’s company Pinnacle…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Sells v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Bynum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bruce Merryman v. Lorie Davis, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Ronk v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
- Victor Hugo Suarez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2019