Commonwealth v. Blumberg
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 165, Oct. T., 1913, by defendant, from order of Q. S. Phila. Co., May Sessions, 1913, No. 2, discharging rule to open judgment in case of Commonwealth v. Jacob Blumberg. Rule to open judgment-. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was order discharging rule to open judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Porter, J.,
This is an appeal by Jacob Blumberg from the refusal of the court below to strike off a judgment against him' *591under a warrant of attorney contained in a recognizance for the appearance of one James Hendricks, before a magistrate of the city of Philadelphia, for a hearing in a case in which Hendricks was charged with the crime of larceny from the person. The recognizance, in due form and properly acknowledged before the magistrate, was conditioned that “the defendant (Hendricks), shall be and appear before Charles P. Rooney, magistrate of court No. 8, at his said court, on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- O'Hara v. BaumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
- North v. YorkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Mishler v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
- Rhoads v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1851
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth ex rel. Philadelphia v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. Iskoe (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927