Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Miller

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1959No. Appeals, Nos. 44 to 47PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

These appeals were taken from four separate orders of the court below denying appellant’s petitions to strike off judgments of' forfeiture entered upon bonds, each of which contained a condition similar to the following: “. . . conditioned that Ruth Ann Kevlock be and appear at the present term Court of Oyer and Terminer and Quarter Sessions of the Peace for the City of Philadelphia, then and there to answer all such charges as may be preferred against the said Ruth Ann Kevlock and to abide and not depart the Court without leave, then this recognizance to be void and of no…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Samango v. HobbsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Commonwealth v. FogelmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. Peoples National Bank v. D. & M. Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Commonwealth v. HillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Commonwealth v. BasendorfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Philadelphia v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Miller v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Whitfield, Ronald DwayneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API