Legal Opinion

White v. Davis

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 6, 2003No. 02-1092PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

This case is before us on petition tice. the court of appeals. We granted the appellee Gary Davis’s petition because the issue presented on appeal called for an interpretation of Ark. Code Ann. § 16-13-317 (Repl. 1997); however, we conclude that the issue was not properly preserved for our review, and therefore, we affirm the trial court.

In November of 1994, Noel Baker, the appellant, selected eighty Holstein heifers from Gary Davis and Davis’s brothers’ dairy farm, residents of Missouri, agreeing to pay $104,000 for the cows, and an additional $2,634 for twenty-six tons of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hodges v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Vanderpool v. Fidelity & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. McElroy v. GrishamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Danzie v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Arkansas Lottery Commission v. Alpha MarketingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  2. Bayer CropScience LP v. SchaferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  3. Estate of Byrd v. TinerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Flagstar Bank v. GibbinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Arkansas Lottery Commission v. Alpha MarketingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API