Legal Opinion

Hogg Construction, Inc. v. Yorktowne Medical Centre, L.P.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 2013PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

STRASSBURGER, J.:

Hogg Construction, Inc. (Hogg) appeals from two orders entered on November 9, 2012, which disposed of Hogg’s claim filed against E. Scott King and Sara A. King (the Kings) pursuant to the Mechanics’ Lien Law, 49 P.S. § 1101 et seq. The trial court granted the Kings’ motion to strike the mechanics’ lien claim. The trial court also granted the Kings’ motion for summary judgment in favor of the Kings and against Hogg. Upon review, we reverse both orders and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

The trial court summarized the underlying facts of this case…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Summers v. CERTAINTEED CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Erie Insurance Exchange v. LarrimoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commerce Bank/Harrisburg, N.A. v. KesslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Tully Drilling Co. v. ShenkinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Brubacher Excavating, Inc. v. Commerce Bank/Harrisburg, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Activision Blizzard, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Rodriguez, M. v. Kravco Simon Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Terra Technical Services, LLC v. River Station Land, L.P.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Terra Technical Services, LLC v. River Station Land, L.P.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API