Legal Opinion
Berkowitz v. Fischbein, Badillo, Wagner & Harding
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 18, 2004PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered February 24, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiff’s cross motion for leave to serve an amended complaint to assert allegations of fraud against defendant Fischbein, Badillo, Wagner & Harding (the Fischbein firm), unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the cross motion denied and the complaint as against this defendant dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the Fischbein firm dismissing the complaint as against it.
*386In May 1996, plaintiff Abraham Berkowitz, Jack Lefkowitz…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wells v. Shearson Lehman/American Express, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Viscardi v. LernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Argyle Capital Management Corp. v. Lowenthal, Landau, Fischer & Bring, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Block v. Brecher, Fishman, Feit, Heller, Rubin & TannenbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fredriksen v. FredriksenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Blum v. PerlsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- NAMA Holdings, LLC v. Greenberg Traurig, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Hugar v. Damon & Morey LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- United States Life Ins. Co. in the City of N.Y. v. HorowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.