Legal Opinion
State v. Lemmer
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 20, 2006No. A05-2481PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLLINS, Judge. *
Appellant State of Minnesota challenges the dismissal of a DWI complaint, contending that (1) the district court erred by adopting a prior district-court order declaring Minn.Stat. § 169A.53, subd. 3(g) (2004), unconstitutional, thereby estopping the state from litigating dispositive stop- and-seizure issues on which respondent Ronald Joseph Lemmer prevailed at his implied-consent hearing; and (2) declaring section 169A.53, subd. 3(g), unconstitutional is violative of the separation-of-powers doctrine. Lemmer moved this court to strike much of the state’s brief as a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Sylvester TIPLER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. E. I. duPONT deNEMOURS AND CO., Inc., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. LemmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. PolsfussCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. LemmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Weidner Apartment Homes v. B. F.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026