Legal Opinion
Cedrin Wingo v. Mich. Bell Telephone Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 11, 2020No. 19-1112Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 20a0341n.06 Case No. 19-1112 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED Jun 11, 2020 CEDRIN WINGO, ) DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED v. ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR ) THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO., et al., ) MICHIGAN ) Defendants-Appellees. ) BEFORE: GILMAN, KETHLEDGE, and READLER, Circuit Judges. CHAD A. READLER, Circuit Judge. Following his termination by Michigan Bell, Cedrin Wingo filed suit alleging that his supervisors violated Title VII and Michigan’s Elliott…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Pram Nguyen v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Chen v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.