Chavis v. TLC Home Health Care
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1DissentTyson, Judge
The majority’s opinion holds Ms. Chavis’s “accident occurred in the course of her employment making her injury compensable.” Ms. Chavis was not at work or “on-duty” and was completing a personal errand when the accident occurred. Also, this single car accident occurred after Ms. Chavis “blacked out,” an idiopathic condition that was the sole cause of the accident. Ms. Chavis’s injury did not “arise out of’ her employment. I respectfully dissent.
I. Standard of Review
The standard of review of an appeal from a decision by the Commission is well-established. “In reviewing an order and award of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Gallimore v. Marilyn's ShoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Mann Media, Inc. v. Randolph County Planning BoardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Vause v. Vause Farm Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Whitfield v. Laboratory Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Brewer v. POWERS TRUCKING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.