Legal Opinion
MHL TEK, LLC v. Nissan Motor Co.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided February 24, 2010No. 4:07-cv-00289PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
T. JOHN WARD, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Pending before the court are five motions for summary judgment of noninfringement filed by the Schrader/TRW defendants 1 (Dkt. No. 423), BMW and Porsche 2 defendants (Dkt. No. 426), Hyundai and Kia 3 defendants (Dkt. No. 444), VW and Audi 4 defendants (Dkt. No. 461), and Nissan 5 defendants (Dkt. No. 607). The motions contend that the defendants’ accused systems do not infringe the asserted claims literally or under the doctrine of equivalents. For the reasons stated below, BMW and Porsche’s, Hyundai and Kia’s, VW and…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- 02 Micro International Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fractus, S.A. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2012
- MHL TEK, LLC v. Nissan Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011