Legal Opinion

Mooney v. Mooney

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 26, 1922No. 7 Div. 275PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMidler, J.

The complainant, Hannah C. Mooney, appellee here, seeks to have canceled and declared void by bill in equity a warranty deed made and executed by her to R. C. Mooney, her son, the defendant and appellant, first, because the deed was secured by undue influence; second, because the deed was secured through fraud or mistake, as it was executed by her as a will when it was a deed ; and, third, because the consideration of the instrument was $1 cash and “the further consideration that the party of the second part [R. C. Mooney] is to look after and care for the party of the first part [Hannah C.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Russell v. CarverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Ballenger v. BallengerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Sipsey Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. McAdory v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Taylor v. CatheySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Van Sickle v. KeckNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Hannah v. CulpepperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API