Legal Opinion

Janice Leaman v. Gregg Wolfe

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 6, 2015No. 14-3511UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION *

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Janice Leaman claims that her former business partner, defendant Gregg Wolfe, breáched the terms of their settlement agreement. The District Court granted summary judgment in Wolfe’s favor on the ground that he substantially performed under the parties’ contractual agreement. For the following reasons, we vacate and remand.

I

In 2010 Leaman brought a state-court action against Wolfe in connection with the breakup of their business. After mediation, the parties signed a settlement agreement (the “Agreement”), under which Lea-man promised not to compete…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Eve Atkinson v. Lafayette College Arthur J. Rothkopf, Esquire, Individually and as President of Lafayette CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  3. Exton Drive-In, Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Highgate Associates, Ltd. v. MerryfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  5. Pantuso Motors, Inc. v. Corestates BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. UNIVERSAL ATLANTIC SYSTEMS, INC. v. BOSTON MARKET CORPORATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API