Legal Opinion

Peacock v. Melvin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 4, 1995No. 94-431PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This appeal arises from a final judgment in which the trial judge found that Virgil Peacock, since deceased, was competent and not under undue influence when he executed two *952deeds and a bill of sale in favor of Appellee Willie Melvin. The cross-appeal challenges the trial court’s finding that title to Peacock’s mobile home and an accompanying affidavit failed to effect a transfer of Peacock’s mobile home. We affirm.

Having read counsels’ briefs and heard oral argument, we must note from the outset that the findings of a trial judge sitting as trier of fact are clothed with the same presumption…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shaw v. ShawSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Herzog v. HerzogSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Cameron v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  4. Leath v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. Stockton, Whatley, Davin & Co. v. BrockDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Congleton v. SansomDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API