Stockton, Whatley, Davin & Co. v. Brock

It is axiomatic that the findings of a trial judge sitting as a trier of fact without a jury are entitled to the same presumption of correctness as is accorded to a jury verdict. Our examination of the record, consideration of the briefs by able counsel and the hearing of oral argument fails to reveal prejudicial error. Accordingly, the final judgment here appealed is

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, C. J., and RAWLS and McCORD, JJ., concur.