Legal Opinion

Boyce v. Town of Templeton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 16, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.

The original plaintiffs in these three tort actions were, respectively, the driver of and two passengers in an automobile which at about 5 a.m. on April 24, 1949, when vision was obscured because of darkness or fog, ran into a pile of prepared paving material or macadam, black in color, on a part of Old Athol Road, so called, in Templeton which had been the subject of statutory actions for discontinuance as a public way by both the Commonwealth and the town. The plaintiffs excepted to the action of the trial judge in directing verdicts for the defendant. There was no error.

The facts were not…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Oliver v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Holmes v. DrewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Butman v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Galluzzi v. City of BeverlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Longley v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morash & Sons, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Puffer v. City of BeverlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API