Legal Opinion

Galluzzi v. City of Beverly

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 27, 1941PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $600 agreed upon as the amount of damage caused to his building and his merchandise by the flooding of his cellar on October 20, 1937.

The case was referred to an auditor whose findings of fact were to be final. The auditor’s findings thus became a case stated. They were binding upon the trial judge where not inconsistent with each other or vitiated by any error of law apparent upon the face of the report. Merrimac Chemical Co. v. Moore, 279 Mass. 147, 152. Heaphy v. Kimball, 293 *136Mass. 414, 417. Edinburg v. Allen-Squire Co. 299 Mass. 206. Vigneault v.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Merrimac Chemical Co. v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Bates v. Inhabitants of WestboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Emery v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Hand v. Inhabitants of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  5. Dickinson v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. New England Gas & Electric Ass'n v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  2. Caissie v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Benjamin Foster Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Union Old Lowell National Bank v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. Members of Bakery & Confectionery Workers International Union of America v. Hall Baking Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API