Legal Opinion

Kaysing v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 11, 1962No. 5087PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaktin, Judge

This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, First Division, Abstract 65708, which overruled the importer’s protest and sustained the collector’s classification of certain imported merchandise which was invoiced as Level Vial Units. The merchandise was classified by similitude in use, under the provisions of paragraph 1559 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to blown *70glass articles, with a duty of 30% ad valorem under paragraph 218(f) as modified, T.D. 53865 and T.D. 53877.

Appellant makes alternative claims for classification as follows:(1) By similitude of use…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Lilly & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. United States v. CochranCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  2. Ross Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API